Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kathir Kaman Jewels Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kathir Kaman Jewels Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai) 6% or 169%? – Unrealistic Margins Exposed: Tribunal remands additions on Jewellery Trader’s Seized Data- Additions on Unaccounted Sales Without Stock adjustment Not Sustainable – ITAT Chennai The appeals arose out of assessments framed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153C pursuant to a search on 23.11.2016 at the premises of Shri B. Ayyappan, shareholder of the Assessee-company. During the search, incriminating documents & electronic data were seized, & in a sworn statement u/s 132(4), Shri Ayyappan admitted undisclosed income of ₹11.5...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930