Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kathir Kaman Jewels Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Kathir Kaman Jewels Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai) 6% or 169%? – Unrealistic Margins Exposed: Tribunal remands additions on Jewellery Trader’s Seized Data- Additions on Unaccounted Sales Without Stock adjustment Not Sustainable – ITAT Chennai The appeals arose out of assessments framed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153C pursuant to a search on 23.11.2016 at the premises of Shri B. Ayyappan, shareholder of the Assessee-company. During the search, incriminating documents & electronic data were seized, & in a sworn statement u/s 132(4), Shri Ayyappan admitted undisclosed income of ₹11.5...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031