Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs K.Rethinam (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs K.Rethinam (ITAT Chennai) Loose sheets not corroborated; Partner’s Remuneration Beyond 40(b) not taxable again u/s 28(v); Alleged cash property investments fail due to retraction & lack of evidence: ITAT Chennai A search under Section 132 was conducted on 08.12.2016 in the SRS Group (including SRS Mining, a partnership firm) and on partners including Shri K. R., Shri S. R., & Shri J. S. Certain loose sheets were found in the office of SRS Mining, purportedly recording huge cash remuneration to partners and alleged cash investments in immovable property. Assessments under Sect...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930