Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT Vs Vodafone Essar Gujarat Ltd (Gujarat High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Prior to the introduction of clause(i) to the explanation to section 115JB, as held by the Supreme Court in case of HCL Comnet Systems and Services Ltd. (supra), the then existing clause (c) did not cover a case where the assessee made a provision for bad or doubtful debt. With insertion of clause (i) to the explanation with retrospective effect, any amount or amounts set aside for provision for diminution in the value of the asset made by the assessee, would be added back for computation of book profit under section 115JB of the Act. However, if this was not a mere provision made by the asses...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

2 Comments

  1. Khaja Anwar Mohiuddin says:

    The above case is nothing but eye wash for the general public to state Banks are taking legal course etc. There is a need to form committees formed from National level to Panchayat level for recovery of bad debts and non performing assets, thus profits of the banks decreased and to cover up losses, service chargers are revised and burden the common account holders.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930