Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Sh. Dinesh Jain (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 3794/Del/2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/05/ 2014
Related Assessment Year : 2009- 10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

CA Prarthana Jalan

Hon’ble Delhi ITAT in the case of Dinesh Jain has held that Penalty u/s. 271E is leviable if a person repays any loan, otherwise, than in accordance with provisions of section 269T. As per section 269T no person shall repay the loan otherwise, than by an account payee cheque or account payee bank draft drawn in the name of the person who has made the loan. Now in this case admittedly the assessee has transferred the loan by way of journal entry to his wife. Therefore, the question is whether there is violation of section 269T so as to penalise the assessee  as required u/s. 271E? When the assessee has transferred the loan from himself to his wife by way of journal entry, it is only the substitution of one debtor by another debtor. So far as creditors i.e. MGF Developments Ltd. is concerned, it has not received any amount and since the creditors has not received any amount, it cannot be said that there is a repayment of loan. Section 269 would come into play only when there is actual repayment of loan. Merely because loan is assigned by the assessee to his wife by way of journal entry, it cannot be said that there is a repayment of loan, otherwise, than by account payee cheque or account payee bank draft, so as to penalize the assessee u/s. 271E.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. J.Janarthanan says:

    Dear Sir, (CA Prarthana Jalan)

    I am a regular reader of Taxguru. Especially read your articles are presented very nice. Thank you very much for taxguru and you for the updates.

    I would like to know whether this judgment (i.e. ITO Vs. Sh. Dinesh Jain, ITA No. 3794/Del/2013, Date of order: 16-05- 2014) pronounced by ITAT, Delhi Bench or by Hon’ble Delhi High court.

    I understand that the said judgment pronounced by ITAT, Delhi Bench.

    Kindly clarify.

    J.Janarthanan

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031