Case Law Details
Case Name : Arvind Purseth Vs CIT(A) (ITAT Cuttack)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-2016 to 2017-2018
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Cuttack
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Arvind Purseth Vs CIT(A) (ITAT Cuttack)
It was submitted by the ld. Sr. DR that the only issue in the appeal of the assessee was that TDS had not been deducted in respect of payments made to M/s Sundaram Finance Ltd. and M/s Gulshan Freight Carrier. It was the submission that Form 26A had been produced before the ld.CIT(A) but had not been produced before the AO. Consequently, the ld. CIT(A) had refused to admit the Form No.26A on the ground that it was in the nature of fresh evidence. It was the submission that the order of
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.