This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Sum received for restraining use of ceased Trademark is non taxable capital receipt
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Orient Blackswan Private Limited, Hyderabad vs. ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Hyderabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Advocate Akhilesh Kumar Sah
The Words ‘Not Sharing’ In Section 28(va)(b) Control The Extended Meaning Of Taxable Income As Appearing In This Section
The clause (va) has been inserted in section 28 of the Income Tax Act, 1961(herein referred to as ‘the Act’) by the Finance Act, 2002 with effect from 1.4.2003 relevant to A.Y. 2003-04. Section 28 of the Act enlists certain incomes chargeable to Income Tax under the head “Profits and gains of business or profession”. Section 28(va)(b), subject to its Proviso and Explanation, deals with payment received for not shari...
