1. ALLOW FILLING ITR AFTER 31-MARCH OF AY

Allow filling Income Tax return after 31st March of Assessment year (Of-course with Higher late fees than currently prescribed ..i.e. Higher than Rs. 10000). Govt will get high revenue if the Taxpayer is having high income.. Earlier 2 years time was allowed to file ITR

2. REDUCTION IN % OF Minimum Maintenance of NET PROFIT in SECTION 44ADA for Professionals

Currently , Sec. 44ADA provides that Professional need to maintain 50% Net profit otherwise go for Tax audit. This % should be reduce to 33%. As 50% presumptive deeming is to high causing High taxes in case of Professionals. 50% net Profit assumption is very high as compare to Practical life profitability.

3. RATIONALISE SECTION 44AE – REDUCE PRESUMPTIVE RATE

Review presumptions schemes. Sec. 44AE not up to mark. Current presumptive rate is too high. This leads to huge taxes to transporter . 1000 per ton theory is high tax volume. Same assessee same situation same transporter how can give 10 time more income. 44AE needs some correction . please compare at least from past provisions.

4. TAX RATES IN CASE OF FIRMS

Currently , They are paying 31.2% . This should be reduced to 25% as corporate are paying at 26%

5. PARTNERSHIP FIRM – 40(b) limit of Max. REMUNERATION

Currently 1.5 lac is allowed in case of lower Book profit or loss. . This should be increased to 3 Lac

Currently , upto 3 lac Book profit – 90% and remaining 60% of Book profit for calculating Max Remuneration.

This 3 lac should be increased to 10 lac

6. PARTNERSHIP FIRM & INGENUINE HARDSHIP OF TAX AUDIT u/s 44AD OR higher Net profit 8%/6%

In case of partnership firms, They need to maintain 8% / 6% Net profit after deducting Remuneration & Interest otherwise they have to go for Tax Audit . This came in Finance Act , 2016 by Deletion of proviso to sub-section (2) providing for deduction of interest and remuneration paid to partners by firm from the presumptive income under section 44AD – Proviso to remain/restored to avoid genuine hardship to small and medium firms . Allow deduction in respect of remuneration paid to partners within the limits set out in section 40(b), the proviso to section to 44AD(2) may be restored. This way, Partnership Firm doesn’t need to maintain HIGHER NET PROFIT.

7. 5 Year Continuity rule in case of Section 44AD

Sec. 44AD opt in and opt out also a tricky & very harsh . As one must comply for 5 year continues

This 5 year terms can be taken 1 year or 2 years.

8. RATIONALISE DUE DATES FOR AVOIDING CLASH (staggered manner)

ITR 1, 2 = 31-7

ITR 3,4, 5 = NON Audited = 31-8

ITR -3, 5 AUDITED & their TAR = 31-10

ITR 6,7 & their TAR= 30-11

TRANSFER PRICING CASE TAR & ITR = 31-12

Every year schema released every late. 26AS updated late. So this problems can be tackled

9. REMOVE TCS ON GOODS

This is nothing but useless Formality . There is no new revenue coming to Government

10. RATIONALISE LATE FEES

for late filling if TCS / TDS return – Rs. 200 per day should be reduced to 25 per day

for late filling of IT return (234f) late fees should be decrease to 1000 till 31-12 , then 5000 till 31-3

SUGGESTIONS TO REFORMING DIRECT TAXES

11. RATIONALISE NEW TAX RATES IN CASE OF INDIVIDUALS / HUF

NO NEW VS OLD RATE. ONLY ONE SET OF TAX RATE SLAB AS BELOW

NO STANDARD DEDUCTION OF 50000 TO SALARIED \ PENSIONERS

NO REBATE OF 12500 AS PER SEC. 87A

NO DEDUCTION AS PER CHAPTER VI-A ( I.E NO DEDUCTION OF LIC+MEDICLAIM+PPF+HOUSING LOAN + NSC +SCHOOL FEES + DONATIONS + ETC ETC )

NO CONFUSION OF SELECTION OF OLD VS NEW

NO CONCEPT OF GTI IN CASE OF INDIVIDUALS / HUF

3 LAC STRAIGHT BASIC EXEMPTION LIMIT TO ALL.

NO CESS

STRAIGHT WAY TAX AFTER 3 LAC INCOME… EACH EARNING COUNTRYMEN WILL CONTRIBUTE TO DEVELOPMENT OF COUNTRY

SUGGESTED TAX RATES ( SLIGHTLY REDUCED TAX BUT INCREASE IN BASE OF TAXPAYER CONTRIBUTING TO COUNTRY). THIS IS SLIGHTLY LOWER THAN WHAT IS CURRENT TAX RATES FOR INDIVIDUAL/HUF CLAIMING POPULAR DEDUCTIONS LIKE 80C+80D

0 – 3 LAC = 0% Incremental tax
3 – 5 LAC = 5% ₹ 10,000
5- 10 LAC = 10% ₹ 50,000
10 -15 LAC = 20% ₹ 1,00,000
15-20 LAC= 25% ₹ 1,25,000
20-30 LAC= 30% ₹ 3,00,000
ABOVE 30 LAC = 35%

12. REPORTING OF LTCG & STCG ON SHARES / DEBENTURES/ MFs / SECURITIES IN 26AS

THERE SHOULD BE REPORTING OF LTCG / STCG WHEN SALE OF EQUITY SHARES / MF , AS PER INCOME TAX NORMS. THIS WILL ENSURE THAT ALL SUCH TRANSACTIONS WILL BE REPORTED UNDER ITR

13. SUGGESTION TO BRING TCS FOR JEWELRY SECTOR

IT IS VERY IGNORED AREA . TCS ON SALE OF GOLD / GOLD ORNAMENTS / DIAMOND ETC if more than RS. 50000 under a B2C transaction. TCS WILL BE COLLECTED BY JEWELER & REPORTING IN FORM 26AS TO BE DONE AS USUAL. AGAIN , THIS WILL ENSURE THAT ALL SUCH TRANSACTIONS WILL BE REPORTED UNDER ITR. it will tap on huge black money stuck in Gold

14. SUGGESTION TO INCREASE TAX PAYER TRUST & TRUST IN OUR TAXATION SYSTEM – HONORING THE HONEST

It’s high time that Government should think for giving some benefits to those tax payers (only individuals) who have contributed to the Economy by paying high taxes in last 70 years. They are the true nation building partner. They are the true contributors to growth of our country. It’s high time Government should think of giving them back & salute their contribution to economy, honesty & loyalty towards country. We have to see other countries how they respect their High taxpayers like USA giving more retirement benefits based on Tax paid in past. A proper scheme should be think upon.

SO WHAT CAN BE DONE?

1. GIVE PRIORITY IN PASSPORT LINE, AIRPORT TICKET COUNTERS 2. GIVE PRIORITY IN RAILWAY RESERVATION, 3. GIVING PRIORITY IN GETTING ANY GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT WORK DONE, 4. GIVING THEM SOME RETIREMENT BENEFIT IN PENSION 5. HEALTHCARE BENEFITS LIKE HEALTH INSURANCE FREELY ETC ETC ETC

15. SOLUTION TO BRING BLACK MONEY / UNDISCLOSED ASSETS INTO SYSTEM

DISCLOSE OF UNDISCLOSED MONEY / PROPERTY / FINANCIAL ASSETS. By ONE TIME AMNESTY SCHEME.

MONEY / ASSETS DISCLOSED IN THIS SCHEME. 50% PAYMENT NOW AS TAX. 50% OF AMOUNT TO BE DEPOSITED IN BANK AS FIXED DEPOSITS with Lock in of 5 years. SO THAT 100% BLACK-MONEY WILL COME INTO SYSTEM.

Author Bio

More Under Income Tax

3 Comments

  1. J. Janarthanan says:

    I strongly object this suggestion especially wrt salaried parsons, pensioners, senior citizen and super senior citizen. Already peoples have huge tax burden on many Taxes, including GST Rates, higher inflation, etc. Request you to Please suggest how to eradicate Poverty, corruption etc

  2. G. Sridharan says:

    Worst suggestion. Senior Citizens, pensioners are already hit by reduction of FD rates, inflation increase, increased health cost etc. How such persons can survive with dignity.

  3. GANDHI MOHAN BHARATI says:

    Pretty bad suggestions. Hitting hardon salaried class and senior citizens and wanting all concessions to corporates and Chartered Accounts. Pretty much in linewithpolicies of Ruling Dispensation

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Posts by Date

January 2021
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031