Streedhan in the form of jewellery received during span of 20-25 yeas cannot be said to be unexplained investment U/s. 69A

Suneela Soni Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)

AO has made the addition of Rs. 10,65,312.00 on account of purported unexplained jewelery claimed by the assessee without appreciating the fact that the jewelery found during the course of search and seizure operations was from the locker held by the father in law and husband of the asses

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.