Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Suruchi Satish Sarmalkar Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Suruchi Satish Sarmalkar Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) The assessee purchased property for ₹79 lakh, whereas the stamp duty value was ₹1.07 crore, leading to an addition of ₹28.07 lakh under Section 56(2)(x). The CIT(A) upheld the addition. Before the ITAT, the assessee produced a private valuer’s report valuing the property at ₹76.48 lakh. Since there was a significant variation between stamp value and actual/valuer value (beyond permissible tolerance), the Tribunal held that proper valuation was required through the Departmental Valuation Officer (DVO). Accordingly, the matter was remanded ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Mere Acceptance of Political Donation Addition Doesn’t Justify Penalty ITAT Allows Full ₹10.15 Lakh Leave Encashment Exemption: ₹25 Lakh CBDT Limit Held Applicable ITAT Deletes Additions Based Solely on Third-Party Seized Tally Data Loans via Banking Channels not Bogus Merely on ‘Shell Company’ Allegation Wrong TAN in Typing Cannot Deny Genuine TDS Credit: ITAT Ahmedabad View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031