Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Chirag D. Tanna V/s Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2006- 07
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
In our considered opinion, the Assessing Officer has to consider the composite transaction. The first appellate authority was wrong in his finding on applicability of explanation to section 43(5). Thus, we vacate this finding. As the nature of business has to be understood in the proper perspective considering the business strategy of the assessee and as the composite transactions of both NSE and BSE have to be taken into account, we set aside the matter to the file of Assessing Officer for adjudication afresh in accordance with law. This ground is, thus, allowed for statistical purposes.  IN...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930