Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Income Tax Officer Vs Travels & Shopping (P) Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2007- 08
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

We have heard the learned Departmental Representative, whereas assessee was not represented, hence decided exparte. Considering the order of the Assessing Officer and the CIT (A) and various explanations filed before the authorities, we do not see any reason to interfere with the order of the CIT (A).

The assessee is a clearing and forwarding agent and has correctly reconciled the amounts received during the year, which were very elaborately discussed by the CIT (A) in the order. Not only that the

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031