This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 69A Cash Deposit Dispute Reopened Due to Missing Agriculture Evidence
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Ganga Sagar Vs DDIT/ADIT (ITAT Lucknow)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2015-16
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Lucknow
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Ganga Sagar Vs DDIT/ADIT (ITAT Lucknow)
69A Dispute Reopened- Agriculture Claim Needs Cultivation Evidence: CIT(A) Order Partly Remanded
Assessee challenged the sustenance of Rs.1,20,000/- added by AO u/s 69A towards alleged unexplained cash deposit. AO had earlier completed reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144C(3) making additions of Rs.5,68,000/- & Rs.1,20,000/-.
CIT(A) deleted the larger addition but upheld Rs.1,20,000/- on the ground that Assessee produced only Khatauni showing ownership & did not furnish Khasra, evidence of cultivation, mandi receipts, sale confirmations or agricultura...
Author Info
