Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ganga Sagar Vs DDIT/ADIT (ITAT Lucknow)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ganga Sagar Vs DDIT/ADIT (ITAT Lucknow) 69A Dispute Reopened- Agriculture Claim Needs Cultivation Evidence: CIT(A) Order Partly Remanded Assessee challenged the sustenance of Rs.1,20,000/- added by AO u/s 69A towards alleged unexplained cash deposit. AO had earlier completed reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144C(3) making additions of Rs.5,68,000/- & Rs.1,20,000/-. CIT(A) deleted the larger addition but upheld Rs.1,20,000/- on the ground that Assessee produced only Khatauni showing ownership & did not furnish Khasra, evidence of cultivation, mandi receipts, sale confirmations or agricultura...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930