Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shivraj Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Lucknow)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Shivraj Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Lucknow)

Assessee, who had not filed return for AY 2012-13, faced an ex-parte assessment u/s 144/147 dated 05.12.2019 wherein AO determined income at Rs.51,05,000/- treating cash deposits as unexplained u/s 69A along with a small interest addition.

CIT(A) upheld assessment without granting effective opportunity. Before Tribunal, Assessee contended that neither AO nor CIT(A) afforded reasonable opportunity to explain the deposits.

Tribunal no

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Recorded Sales Cannot Be Taxed Again U/s 68; Additions Based Only on Third-Party Statement Deleted On-Money Addition for Flat Purchase Deleted; Builder’s General Statement Alone Not Enough Bogus Purchase Cases: Only Profit Element Taxable; 4% GP Addition Upheld Assessment on Amalgamated Company Held Void for Lack of Jurisdiction Penalty for Non-Compliance Deleted as Venial Breach Where Assessments Accepted Returned Income View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031