Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shivraj Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Lucknow)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shivraj Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Lucknow) Assessee, who had not filed return for AY 2012-13, faced an ex-parte assessment u/s 144/147 dated 05.12.2019 wherein AO determined income at Rs.51,05,000/- treating cash deposits as unexplained u/s 69A along with a small interest addition. CIT(A) upheld assessment without granting effective opportunity. Before Tribunal, Assessee contended that neither AO nor CIT(A) afforded reasonable opportunity to explain the deposits. Tribunal noted this grievance, observed no objection from Revenue, & restored the entire matter to AO for fresh assessment after provid...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930