Case Law Details
Case Name : Srinivasappa Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Bangalore
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Srinivasappa Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
The appeal concerns the addition of ₹14,10,000 as unexplained cash deposits under section 69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, made by the Assessing Officer (AO) and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] for Assessment Year 2017-18. The AO identified cash deposits of ₹7,40,000 in an SBI account and ₹6,70,000 in an HDFC account, treating them as unexplained money. The CIT(A) held that the assessee failed to explain the source of these deposits and therefore sustained the addition.
Before the Tribunal, the assess
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


