Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Srinivasappa Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Srinivasappa Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)

The appeal concerns the addition of ₹14,10,000 as unexplained cash deposits under section 69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, made by the Assessing Officer (AO) and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] for Assessment Year 2017-18. The AO identified cash deposits of ₹7,40,000 in an SBI account and ₹6,70,000 in an HDFC account, treating them as unexplained money. The CIT(A) held that the assessee failed to explain the source of these deposits and therefore sustained the addition.

Before the Tribunal, the assess

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031