Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bharat Keshavlal Shah Vs PCIT (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Bharat Keshavlal Shah Vs PCIT (ITAT Pune)

Lastly comes the issue of section 56(2)(vii) made applicable in assessee’s case on account of alleged difference between stamp valuation and actual purchase consideration qua the sale deed executed in the relevant previous year.

A perusal of the said sale deed dated 31.12.2013, and more particularly, the schedule of payment therein at page-16 indicates that the assessee had already paid an amount of Rs.50,000/- on 20.09.2016 by way of bank cheque

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. madhav says:

    Section 56(2)(vii) applies to purchaser of capital asset & Section 50C to Buyer
    i think the heading should be
    & Section 50C to Transferer/seller and not buyer

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31