Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Lilo Satramdas Ballani Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Lilo Satramdas Ballani Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Flat Booked in 2009 Saves Buyer from Huge 56(2)(vii)(b) Addition – Change of Flat Number Not Tax Evasion ITAT Steps In Assessee purchased a flat for Rs.48,00,000 while stamp-duty valuation on registration dated 22/08/2016 stood at Rs.1,73,65,600. AO invoked u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) & added Rs.1,25,65,000, disregarding Assessee’s claim that the flat was originally booked in 2009 with payments of Rs.20,00,000 & Rs.28,00,000 duly evidenced in bank statements. Assessee was first allotted Flat No.1403 in 2009, later replaced with Flat No.1002 due to ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930