Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Lilo Satramdas Ballani Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Lilo Satramdas Ballani Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

Flat Booked in 2009 Saves Buyer from Huge 56(2)(vii)(b) Addition – Change of Flat Number Not Tax Evasion ITAT Steps In

Assessee purchased a flat for Rs.48,00,000 while stamp-duty valuation on registration dated 22/08/2016 stood at Rs.1,73,65,600. AO invoked u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) & added Rs.1,25,65,000, disregarding Assessee’s claim that the flat was originally booked in 2009 with payments of Rs.20,00,000 & Rs.28,00,000 duly evidenced in ban

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Assessment on Amalgamated Company Held Void for Lack of Jurisdiction Penalty for Non-Compliance Deleted as Venial Breach Where Assessments Accepted Returned Income Carbon Credit Sale Treated as Capital Receipt, Not Taxable Income Search Assessments Quashed for Lack of Prior U/s 153D Approval Documented and Repaid Unsecured Loans Cannot Be Treated as Accommodation Entries u/s 68 View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031