Case Law Details
Case Name : Kirankumar Amrutlal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Ahmedabad
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kirankumar Amrutlal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Routine Business Cash Deposits Can’t Be Taxed u/s 69A – ITAT Ahmedabad Quashes 115BBE Hit- No ITR Doesn’t Mean Unexplained Cash: Tribunal Protects Small Trader in DM Period Case
Assessee, a small Kariyana Trader, deposited Rs.10,09,000 in his two bank accounts during demonetisation. AO treated the sum as unexplained money u/s 69A & taxed it u/s 115BBE, mainly because no return was filed for AY 2017-18. Assessee explained that his sales were Rs.48,31,
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


