Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kirankumar Amrutlal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Kirankumar Amrutlal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Routine Business Cash Deposits Can’t Be Taxed u/s 69A – ITAT Ahmedabad Quashes 115BBE Hit- No ITR Doesn’t Mean Unexplained Cash: Tribunal Protects Small Trader in DM Period Case

Assessee, a small Kariyana Trader, deposited Rs.10,09,000 in his two bank accounts during demonetisation. AO treated the sum as unexplained money u/s 69A & taxed it u/s 115BBE, mainly because no return was filed for AY 2017-18. Assessee explained that his sales were Rs.48,31,

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Assessment on Amalgamated Company Held Void for Lack of Jurisdiction Penalty for Non-Compliance Deleted as Venial Breach Where Assessments Accepted Returned Income Carbon Credit Sale Treated as Capital Receipt, Not Taxable Income Search Assessments Quashed for Lack of Prior U/s 153D Approval Documented and Repaid Unsecured Loans Cannot Be Treated as Accommodation Entries u/s 68 View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031