Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax-5(2)(2) Vs. Shri Dawood Abdulhussain (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

DCIT Vs. Shri Dawood Abdulhussain (ITAT Mumbai)

Word “own” in s. 54F would include only the case where a residential house is fully and wholly owned by assessee and consequently would not include a residential house owned by more than one person.

Claim of the assessee that he was not the absolute owner of the aforesaid properties, i.e. Tara Manzil and Noor Manzil, but was only a co-owne

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

3 Comments

  1. K K Naria says:

    It appears that Hon ITAT has taken a very narrow view of ownership of a house property.When a joint owner of a house is entitled to claim deduction of house loan interest as if he/she is the absolute owner, it will be interesting to see what will be judgement of higher appellate authority i.e. high court or supreme court if the order is conteted

  2. RS says:

    GREAT UPDATE BUT THE HEADING SAY – “Section 54/54F: Jointly owned house will not be considered in house property calculation” BUT IT IS ACTUALLY ON – “Section 54F: Jointly owned house will not be considered FOR DISALLOWANCE OF EXEMPTION U/S 54F WHILE CALCULATING CAPITAL GAINS”

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31