This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 44AD: Assessee need not explain individual entry of cash deposit in bank
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Sri. Girish V.Yalakkishettar Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2013-14
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Sri. Girish V.Yalakkishettar Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Section 44AD of the Act gives an option to the assessee to offer income on presumptive basis. These are special provisions. The assessee has opted for the same and offered to tax income at the rate of 8% of his turnover. The issue is whether, the Assessing Officer can examine statement of accounts in such cases, make additions towards undisclosed purchases, undisclosed expenditure, under valuation of closing stock etc. In our considered opinion such additions go against the spirit of the Act. Section 44AD of the Act was introduced to help ...





