Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hotel Rajdhani Vs DCIT, CPC (ITAT Nagpur)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Hotel Rajdhani Vs DCIT, CPC (ITAT Nagpur) The only issue is to be decided is as to whether the CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi justified in confirming the disallowance made by the AO u/s. 40A(3) on account of cash payment towards electricity bill paid to Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL). MSEDCL is a State under Article 12 of the Constitution and the cash payments made to its franchise/agent is covered under Rule 6DD(b) of the Rules. Therefore, the disallowance under Section 40A(3) made by the CPC and as confirmed by the CIT(A) is not justified. FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031