Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Section 40A(3) Disallowance not applicable on cash payment to MSEDCL

Case Law Details

Case Name
Hotel Rajdhani Vs DCIT, CPC (ITAT Nagpur)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2018-19
Advertisement Hotel Rajdhani Vs DCIT, CPC (ITAT Nagpur) The only issue is to be decided is as to whether the CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi justified in confirming the disallowance made by the AO u/s. 40A(3) on account of cash payment towards electricity bill paid to Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL). MSEDCL is a State under Article 12 of the Constitution and the cash payments made to its franchise/agent is covered under Rule 6DD(b) of the Rules. Therefore, the disallowance under Section 40A(3) made by the CPC and as confirmed by the CIT(A) is not justified. FULL TEXT...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *