Case Law Details
Case Name : Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Vs Kirtilal Kalidas Jewellers (P.) Ltd. (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Chennai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
IN THE ITAT CHENNAI BENCH ‘A’
Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax
Versus
Kirtilal Kalidas Jewellers (P.) Ltd.
IT APPEAL NO. 564 (MDS.) OF 2012
C.O. NO. 70 (MDS.) OF 2012
[ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09]
SEPTEMBER 5, 2012
ORDER
Abraham P. George, Accountant Member – These are appeal by the Revenue and cross-objection by the assessee, directed against an order dated 16.12.2011 of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-I, Coimbatore.
2. Revenue in its appeal is aggrieved that CIT (Appeals) deleted an addition of Rs. 1,32,34,396/- made by the A.O. alleging violation of Se...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.
0 Comments
Cancel reply
Need your suggestion on Sec 40 A (3)
Payment through the bank account of supplier by depositing of cash in excess of Rs.20000/-under CBS system of banking network
Can it be disallowed as an expense just cash is being deposited to bank account,treated as cash payment.
But my contention is that payment is made to bank which is covered under exception, as payment to bank is not defined for what purpose .If some body draws a draft by paying cash and the same draft handed over to supplier for supplies will be allowed as expense then why cash deposited in current account of supplier will not be allowed as expense
please advise and provide any case law if available.