Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Maranaikana Halli Jayashella Shetty Pradeepkumar Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-2018
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Maranaikana Halli Jayashella Shetty Pradeepkumar Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) 271B Penalty- When the Assessee Has Not Maintained the Books of Account, There Is No Question of Getting the Books of Account Audited U/S 44AB Assessment was completed u/s 143(3) making  additions to the returned income u/s 44AD.  AO initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271A &  271B. Penalty u/s 271B was imposed for the reason that the assessee was required to get his books of account audited and having failed to do the same. Assessee filed appeal before the CIT(A). As there was no appearance / compliance to the noti...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

2 Comments

  1. cavkshetty says:

    Rachi Tribunal in a recent decision dt 15.05.2023 held that 271A & 271B are independent. 271B Penalty can be levied even when the books of account are not maintained

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930