Follow Us :

Case Law Details

Case Name : Late Kadir Usman Shaikh Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Appeal Number : ITA No.1116/PUN/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 08/09/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2006-07

Late Kadir Usman Shaikh Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)

It emerges at the outset that the appellant herein Smt. Bilkis Kadir Shaikh the legal heir of the diseased assessee Shri Kadir Usman Shaikh.

That being the case, we quote CIT vs. S.Gouri [2019] 417 ITR 45 (Madras) to hold that the impugned penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer is not maintainable against the assessee’s legal heir herein under section 159 of the Act. We therefore delete the impugned penalty for this precise reason alone. All other pleadings on merits stand rendered academic.

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT PUNE

These assessee’s appeals for Assessment Year 2006-07 arises against the CIT(A), Pune-6’s orders dated 17.05.2019 passed in case no.PN/CIT(A)-6/ITO W.8(4)/318/2014-15 in proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short “the Act”].

Heard both the parties. Case files perused.

2. It emerges at the outset that the appellant herein Smt.Bilkis Kadir Shaikh the legal heir of the diseased assessee Shri Kadir Usman Shaikh. She challenges correctness of both the learned lower authorities action imposing section 271(1)(c) penalty of Rs.3,17,517/- pertaining to the estimation of profits derived from sale of land treated as business income followed by section 40A(3) disallowance made in the assessment order dated 31.12.2009.

3. We next note that there is hardly any need for us to delve deeper in the relevant factual matrix. Suffice to say, the assessee herein Shri Kadir Usman Shaikh appears to have expired well before the Assessing Officer’s penalty order dated 28.03.2014. That being the case, we quote CIT vs. S.Gouri [2019] 417 ITR 45(Madras) to hold that the impugned penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer is not maintainable against the assessee’s legal heir herein under section 159 of the Act. We therefore delete the impugned penalty for this precise reason alone. All other pleadings on merits stand rendered academic.

4. This assessee’s appeal is allowed in above terms.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 8th September, 2022.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031