Section 271(1)(c) Penalty notice issued without strike off of irrelevant part not sustainable

Kanshi Ram through Legal heir Sh. Sanjeev Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)

On perusal of the notice issued u/s 274 read with section 271(1)(c) of the Act we observe that the notice issued was stereotyped and the Assessing officer has not specified any limb or charge for which the notice was issued i.e., either for concealment of particulars of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of such income. It can be seen from the notice issued u/s 274 read with section 271(1)(c) of the Act, Assessing Officer did not strike off irrel

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.