Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri Atul Kumar Bansal Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2000-01 to 2003-04
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Shri Atul Kumar Bansal Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)

Hon’ble Bombay High Court (Full Bench at Goa) in the case of Mr. Mohd. Farhan A. Shaikh ACIT [(2021) 434 ITR 1 (Bom)] while dealing with the issue of non-strike off of the irrelevant part in the notice issued u/s.271(l)(c) of the Act, held that assessee must be informed of the grounds of the penalty proceedings only through statutory notice and an omnibus notice suffers from the vice of vagueness.

ITAT held that as in this case notice u/s.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31