Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Section 270A Penalty Fails After Quantum Section 56(2)(x) Addition Is Set Aside

Case Law Details

Case Name
Akil Abbas Rassai Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2018-19
Advertisement
Akil Abbas Rassai Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Section 270A Penalty Deleted as Underlying Section 56(2)(x) Addition Set Aside for Fresh Adjudication The assessee was levied penalty of ₹16.05 lakh under section 270A for alleged under-reporting of income arising from an addition of ₹82.35 lakh under section 56(2)(x). However, in separate quantum proceedings, the Tribunal had already set aside this very addition and restored the issue to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination based on evidences. The Tribunal held that penalty under section 270A is consequential to a final and crystallised findi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,493

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *