Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bysol Enterprises Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bysol Enterprises Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) The assessee’s assessment for AY 2017-18 was reopened alleging bogus purchases of ₹4.66 crore from an alleged accommodation entry provider. Though the original notice was issued in April 2021 under the old law, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Ashish Agarwal the proceedings were converted to the new regime and a fresh order under section 148A(d) and notice under section 148 were issued on 19.07.2022. By that date, more than three years had elapsed from the end of AY 2017-18 (i.e. beyond 31.03.2021). Under the post-2021 reassessment law...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930