Case Law Details
Case Name : Shri Rohil Singhal Vs Shri Waseem Arshad (ITAT Agra)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Shri Rohil Singhal Vs Shri Waseem Arshad (ITAT Agra)
It is seen that prior 01.06.2015, there was no enabling provision in the Act u/s 200A for raising demand in respect of levy of fee u/s 234E of the Act. The provision of Section 234E of the Act is charging provision i.e. substantive provision which could not be applied retrospectively, unless it is expressly provided in the Act, to levy the late fee for any delay in filing the TDS statement for the period prior to 01.06.2015. The counsel for the assessee has rightly contended that in the absence of enabling provisions u/s 200A of
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.