Section 14A – Onus on AO to show expenditure incurred to earn tax-free income

In “CIT v. Hero Cycles” (supra), it was held by the  Punjab & Haryana High Court, inter alia, that the contention of the Revenue that directly or indirectly some expenditure was always incurred, which must be disallowed u/s 14A of the Act and the impact of the expenditure so incurred could not be allowed to be set off against the business income which may nullify the mandate of section 14A, could not be accepted;

and that the disallowance u/s 14A required a finding of inc

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.