Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Motilal Chunilal & Muktalal Shaw (HUF) & Ors. Vs Asstt. CIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Motilal Chunilal & Muktalal Shaw (HUF) & Ors. Vs Asstt. CIT (ITAT Kolkata)

The question raised in appeal is challenging the action of CIT(A) in confirming the addition made on account of Section 14(A) r.w.s. 8D(2)(ii)&(iii) of the Rules..

The assessee earned dividend of Rs. 52,012/- and claimed the same as exempt income. The AO by invoking Rule 8D(ii) and (iii) disallowed an amount of Rs. 24,152/- and added to the said disallowance to the total income o

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31