Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Uttrakhand Poorv Sainik Kalyan Nigam Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Dehradun)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 3129/Del/2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/06/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Uttrakhand Poorv Sainik Kalyan Nigam Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Dehradun)

Recently the Circuit Bench Of Dehradun Income Tax Appellate Tribunal passed an judgement in the above case examining the validity of assumption of jurisdiction by Ld. AO. The central point of discussion was whether AO was right in issuing notice u/s 148 to the assessee even when the due date for filing the return of income is available in terms of section 139(4).

Issue:-

Assessee is a company who’s main motive is to provide employment to ex- serviceman and their dependencies for their welfare and thus claiming exemption u/s 10(26BBB). The assessee did not filed its return of income for the AY 2014-15 as per the time limit specified u/s 139(1) but filed its return of income on 06.10.2015 well within the time limit specified u/s 139(4) i.e. 31.03.2016. The Ld. AO after the expiry of the time limit u/s 139(1) issued a notice u/s 148 that an income has escaped the assessment on 22.01.2015 without the approval of higher authorities. The assessee filed an appeal on the grounds that the proceedings initiated u/s 147 and notice issued u/s 148 is also bad in law as time limit of filing return u/s 139(4) has not lapsed and no approval of higher authorities was taken.

Analysis of Order passed by the ITAT :-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

I am a qualified Chartered Accountant with my experience in tax litigation matters both Income Tax , at an earlier age of 24 I have started representing before CIT(A) & ITAT and have been successful in providing relief to my clients , I have a vast knowledge regarding Futures & Options Trans View Full Profile

My Published Posts

GSTR-1 can be amended even after the due date is crossed: Orissa High Court Sec 54 & 54F exemptions aren’t just for Property Owners: Here’s How you and your spouse/Legal Heirs can benefit Name of concerned AO can’t be reflected in notice issued u/s 148 in faceless manner: HC Moonlighting Income: Income Tax Return filing guide for Moonlighters Unrecorded Stock can’t be added U/S 69B if found connected with business of assessee View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

2 Comments

  1. KIRITKUMAR DAIYA says:

    Thank you so much for publishing this order of ITAT, Dehradun for Public knowledge and guidance so as to enable them to be aware of their Rights and Duties for proper Tax compliance.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031