This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 148 Notice Invalid as It Was Served After Limitation Period: ITAT Mumbai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Pradeep Shyamlal Sayani Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Pradeep Shyamlal Sayani Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
The ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee’s appeal and quashed reassessment proceedings after holding that a notice under Section 148 cannot be treated as issued within limitation merely because it bore an earlier date when it was actually signed and served later.
The assessee had filed a return declaring total income of ₹5,82,400 for AY 2017-18. The case was reopened based on information that deposits of ₹1.46 crore had been made in eight bank accounts maintained with ICICI Bank and Syndicate Bank. The Assessing Officer (AO) issue...





