Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Section 148 Notice Invalid as It Was Served After Limitation Period: ITAT Mumbai

Case Law Details

Case Name
Pradeep Shyamlal Sayani Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2017-18
Advertisement Pradeep Shyamlal Sayani Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) The ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee’s appeal and quashed reassessment proceedings after holding that a notice under Section 148 cannot be treated as issued within limitation merely because it bore an earlier date when it was actually signed and served later. The assessee had filed a return declaring total income of ₹5,82,400 for AY 2017-18. The case was reopened based on information that deposits of ₹1.46 crore had been made in eight bank accounts maintained with ICICI Bank and Syndicate Bank. The Assessing Officer (AO) issue...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 18,864

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *