Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : KCL AMRCL Joint Venture Vs. Income-tax Officer (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2012- 13 & 2013- 14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

KCL AMRCL Joint Venture Vs. ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)

Coming to the findings of the CIT(A) that in the case of assessee estimate of the profit of the business as well as dis allowance u/s 40(ba) is the only way out, the fact that JV is created only to secure the orders and nowhere on record, we find that the assessee has actually executed the work. JV is formed merely to secure the orders and not to execute the orders. When the assessee has not executed the order, there is no question of making any profit. As the a

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31