Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs S.P.Cold Storage (ITAT Raipur)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Mere mentioning of name in Search Warrant & Panchanama not sufficient for contemplating search against the assessee firm, Search at the residential premises of the Partners could not be deemed to be a search on the assessee firm, In pursuance of only a survey operation under section 133A, assessments u/s.153A could not be framed.

In this case there was a search. In the warrant of authorisation the assessee’s firm’s name was there atfer the names of 8 individ

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31