Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rashmikant Kundalia and another Vs Union of India(Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Pettition for Speacial Leave to Appeal (C) .......CC (No)(s). 22880/2015
Date of Judgement/Order : 03/01/2017
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Honourable Bombay High Court, in the case of Rashmikant Kundalia and another Vs Union of India and others has upheld the constitutional validity of the Section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which deals with fees for late filing of TDS/TCS Returns.

Against the  Bombay High Court order Assessee has preferred an Special Leave Petition(SLP) with Supreme Court  and same is been admitted by Hon’ble Supreme Court.

Rashmikant Kundalia Supreme Court

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. shreetam says:

    I had bought a flat in march2016 ,and was not aware about the 1% tds process, hence had filed the 1% amount late. And since, the amount was filed late , i got a demand notice which has late fee of 50k under 234e and interest. So ,does this judgment (Rashmikant Kundalia and another Vs Union of India(Supreme Court of India) help me in anyway.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
October 2024
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031