Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rashmikant Kundalia and another Vs Union of India(Supreme Court of India)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Honourable Bombay High Court, in the case of Rashmikant Kundalia and another Vs Union of India and others has upheld the constitutional validity of the Section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which deals with fees for late filing of TDS/TCS Returns.

Against the  Bombay High Court order Assessee has preferred an Special Leave Petition(SLP) with Supreme Court  and same is been admitted by Hon’ble Supreme Court.

Rashmikant Kundalia Supreme Court

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. shreetam says:

    I had bought a flat in march2016 ,and was not aware about the 1% tds process, hence had filed the 1% amount late. And since, the amount was filed late , i got a demand notice which has late fee of 50k under 234e and interest. So ,does this judgment (Rashmikant Kundalia and another Vs Union of India(Supreme Court of India) help me in anyway.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930