This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Rule 8D not applicable if AO not recorded dis-satisfaction with correctness of claim of assessee
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Pr. CIT Vs. Reliance Capital Asset Management Ltd. (Bombay High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Bombay High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Pr. CIT Vs. Reliance Capital Asset Management Ltd. (Bombay High Court)
The assessing officer did not specifically record that he is not satisfied with the correctness of the claim of the assessee in respect of the expenditure in relation to the income which does not form part of the total income under the Act. However, he felt obliged and going by the presence of rule 8D that once section 14A is attracted, the dis allowance is to be made as per rule 8D only which has been prescribed by the Legislature. The assessing officer has not adverted to the plain language of sub-section (2) of section 1...
