This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Despite Retrospective amednment Royalty Not Taxable as DTAA prevails
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- B4U International Holdings Ltd. Vs. DCIT (IT) (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2002-03
- Courts
- ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
In this case Assessing officer has made disallowance u/s. 40(a)(i) on payment for hiring charges for transponder, paid to PanAmSat Limited on the ground that no tax has been deducted at source by the assessee, u/s. 195 of the Act.
Argument of learned Departmental Representative that the amendment to the Finance Act, 2012 changes the position, we find that there is no change in the DTAA between India and USA. Thus, the amendments have no affect on our decision.
Even otherwise as the payment is made from one non-resident to another non-resident outside India on the basis of contract executed ou...
