Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Investeringsforeningen BankInvest Vs DDIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No.3721/Mum/2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/10/2014
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

The assessee is a FUND and a resident of Denmark. Along with its return of income, in India, the assessee had submitted ‘Tax Residency Certificate’ issued by the Danish Authorities in order to claim the benefit of Article 14 of India-Denmark DTAA. From the plain reading of the ‘reasons recorded̵

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. dr.g,balakrishnan PhD ML., says:

    SC judgement is very relevant as AOs simply move irrationally in most cases resulting in unnecessary litigation and waste of moneys both the govt as also to tax payers.

    i think CBDT need to correctly formulate things before things go out of control, as economy is indeed fragile all over , that way only every day fluctuations do indicate all over world as excessive derivatives are applied.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
September 2024
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30