Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sheetal Clothing Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sheetal Clothing Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) For AY 2017-18, the Assessing Officer issued notice under section 148 on 29.07.2022 after passing an order under section 148A(d) on the same date, alleging unexplained unsecured loans of about ₹72.97 lakh. This was clearly more than three years after the end of the assessment year (which ended on 31.03.2018, so the three-year period expired on 31.03.2021). Under the post-2021 reassessment regime, where notice is issued after three years and the alleged escaped income exceeds ₹50 lakh, prior sanction must be obtained from the higher a...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930