Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Palanisamy Shankarganesh Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Palanisamy Shankarganesh Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) Reassessment quashed for wrong sanction u/s 151(ii) – Approval by PCIT invalid after 3 years – ITAT Chennai In Palanisamy Shankarganesh vs ITO (A.Y. 2018-19), reassessment was initiated alleging bogus purchases based on investigation wing information. The AO issued notice u/s 148 on 05.04.2022, beyond three years from the end of the assessment year, after obtaining approval only from the Principal Commissioner. The ITAT admitted additional legal grounds and examined section 151. It held that where more than three years have elapsed, approval m...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Additions Fail: Documentary Evidence Cannot Be Ignored Without Enquiry Commission Disallowance Remanded – 133(6) Non-Response Not Sufficient; Ad-hoc Expenses Cut to 10% Stamp Duty vs Actual Value Dispute: ITAT Orders DVO Valuation ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930