Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Re-assessment proceedings cannot, be initiated on the ground that the Assessing Officer was legally wrong and had misapplied and wrongly understood the law/legal position

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2011 taxguru.in 1273
Case Name
BLB Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement

BLB Limited Vs. ACIT  (Delhi HC)

If in the course of original assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer has considered and examined a particular aspect, the said aspect cannot be made a ground to reopen and initiate reassessment proceedings. The assessing authority cannot have a fresh look and reopen an assessment on the ground of change of opinion.

The facts noticed above, clearly show that in the original assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer had considered and examined whether or not the non-compete fee payment was of capital or revenue nature. The Assessing Officer accepted the stand of the assessee and treated the non-compete fee as a revenue expenditure. The re-assessment proceedings cannot, therefore, be initiated on the ground that the Assessing Officer was legally wrong and had misapplied and wrongly understood the law/legal position.

In the present case, it is noticeable that the assessee had disclosed fully and truly all material facts relevant for the assessment. The reasons recorded above do not disclose or state that there was failure or omission to disclose fully and truly all material facts. There is no indication and it is not alleged that there was some material or information available on record when reasons to reopen were recorded, to show that the assessee had concealed or had not disclosed fully and truly all material facts. The material facts were on record and had been disclosed by the asssesee. The factual matrix above indicates that the Revenue verily believes that the Assessing Officer had drawn a wrong legal inference and a conclusion, which it is submitted is incorrect. In these circumstances, it has to be held that the re-assessment proceedings have not been validly initiated as the condition of the proviso to Section 147 is not satisfied.

HIGH COURT OF DELHI

Date of decision: December 01, 2011

W.P.(C) 6884/2010

BLB Limited

Versus

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

JUDGEMENT

SANJIV KHANNA,J: (ORAL)

The petitioner BLB Ltd. has filed the present writ petition impugning notice under Section 148 dated 01.02.2010 and the order dated 16.9.2010 passed by the Assessing Officer dismissing their objections to the re-opening. 2.      Reasons given for re-opening of the assessment for assessment year 2003-04 under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) are as under:-

Paid content

Become a Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Premium member.

Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.