Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT Vs Soyuz Industrial Resources Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA--158/2015
Date of Judgement/Order : 27/02/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Brief Facts of the Case and Question of Law

Brief Facts

The brief facts of the case are that for Assessment Year (AY) 2002-03, the assessee had filed its returns in a normal course on 16.10.2002. The assessment was framed under Section 143(1). Based upon information received by the Assessing Officer (AO), a satisfaction note was recorded sometime in early 2009 and a notice was issued in 2009 i.e. four years beyond the end of the assessment year, under proviso to Section 147(1). The re-assessment proceedings were completed on 31.12.2009. The assessee in its appeal urged that the notice under Section 147 was unsustainable for the reason it was not approved by the competent authority in accordance with Section 151 of the Act.

Question of Law

Whether notice under section 148 can be issued by Commissioner who is ranked higher in authority than the required Joint Commissioner authority as mentioned in law?

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031