Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

No quantum Section 68 addition in case concealment penalty was deleted

Case Law Details

Case Name
Basir Ahmed Sisodiya Vs ITO (Supreme Court of India)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
1998-99
Advertisement
Basir Ahmed Sisodiya Vs ITO (Supreme Court) Conclusion: Even though assessee failed to prove the genuineness of the purchases during the assessment proceedings, he filed affidavits and statements of the dealers in penalty proceedings and appellate authority had not only accepted the explanation offered by assessee but also recorded a clear finding of fact that there was no concealment of income or furnishing of any inaccurate particulars of income by assessee thus the quantum addition under section 68 would also have to be deleted. Held: Officer, inter alia, while relying on the Balance Sheet ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *