Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Basir Ahmed Sisodiya Vs ITO (Supreme Court of India)
Related Assessment Year : 1998-99
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Basir Ahmed Sisodiya Vs ITO (Supreme Court) Conclusion: Even though assessee failed to prove the genuineness of the purchases during the assessment proceedings, he filed affidavits and statements of the dealers in penalty proceedings and appellate authority had not only accepted the explanation offered by assessee but also recorded a clear finding of fact that there was no concealment of income or furnishing of any inaccurate particulars of income by assessee thus the quantum addition under section 68 would also have to be deleted. Held: Officer, inter alia, while relying on the Balance Sheet ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031