This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No quantum Section 68 addition in case concealment penalty was deleted
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Basir Ahmed Sisodiya Vs ITO (Supreme Court of India)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 1998-99
- Courts
- Supreme Court of India
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Basir Ahmed Sisodiya Vs ITO (Supreme Court)
Conclusion: Even though assessee failed to prove the genuineness of the purchases during the assessment proceedings, he filed affidavits and statements of the dealers in penalty proceedings and appellate authority had not only accepted the explanation offered by assessee but also recorded a clear finding of fact that there was no concealment of income or furnishing of any inaccurate particulars of income by assessee thus the quantum addition under section 68 would also have to be deleted.
Held: Officer, inter alia, while relying on the Balance Sheet ...




