Case Law Details
Govind Vs State of Haryana (Punjab & Haryana High Court)
Briefly, the allegations against the petitioner are that on 06.01.2019, the police registered a written complaint from Excise and Taxation Officer, Panipat. The complaint mentioned that a Firm got registered under HGST Act on the basis of fake and forged documents and thus received the Government authority by submitting fake documents on Government GST online platform for falsely utilizing input tax credit. Based on the said information, the police registered FIR mentioned above. The investigation reveals the involvement of the accused in the offence which led to his arrest on 27.11.2020. Based on these allegations, the Police registered the FIR mentioned above.
Held by HC
Given the gravity of accusations and the heinous nature of the offence, the petitioner shall surrender all weapons, firearms, ammunition, if any, along with the arms license to the concerned authority within 30 days from today and inform the Investigator about the
During the trial’s pendency, if the petitioner repeats or commits any offence where the sentence prescribed is more than seven years or violates any condition as stipulated in this order, it shall always be permissible to the respondent to apply for cancellation of this bail.It shall further be open for any investigating agency to bring it to the notice of the Court seized of the subsequent application that the accused was earlier cautioned not to indulge in criminal activities. Otherwise, the bail bonds shall continue to remain in force throughout the trial and after that in terms of Section 437-A of the CrPC.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
