Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Canara Bank Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12 to 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Canara Bank Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT Bangalore held that when the proviso to section 36(1)(vii) applies to bad debts written off relating to rural advances, the same cannot be applied for disallowing deduction claimed on account of write off of bad and doubtful debts relating to nonrural/urban advances. Facts- For AY 2011-12, the AO noted that the assessee had claimed deduction of bad debts under Section 36(1)(vii) Income Tax Act without actually writing off the debts as irrecoverable in the individual loan accounts of the debtors concerned. The AO found that majority of the write-off was...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930