Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pratap Thakraji Solanki Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pratap Thakraji Solanki Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Only Profit on Bogus Purchases Taxable– Full 69C Addition Deleted, ITAT Restricts Addition to GP Rate of 11.54%; No Cross-Examination, No 100% Disallowance – ITAT Grants Partial Relief to Assessee Assessee, a proprietor of M/s Honesty Tube Industries, filed appeal against the order of CIT(A), NFAC, dated 04.08.2025 confirming an addition of ₹32,75,050 u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure, treating his purchases from M/s Bristal Tube Industries as bogus. The case was reopened u/s 147 based on information from the Directorate General of GST Intel...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031