Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In Re. LS Cable Ltd. (AAR Delhi)
Appeal Number : AAR No. 858- 861 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 26/07/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Court :Authority for Advanced Ruling

Citation: Advanced Ruling (AAR), in the case of LS Cable Ltd. (AAR No. 858- 861 of 2009)

Brief: Recently, the Authority for Advanced Ruling held that pendency of a similar matter of the applicant in respect to transaction with a different party, before a statutory forum, is no bar to seek advance ruling in respect of another transaction.

Background- As per clause (i) of proviso to Section 245R of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act), the AAR shall not allow an application, where the question raised in the application is already pending before any income-tax authority or Appellate Tribunal or any court.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. SACHIN says:

    IF an indivisual are not tax payer then can he claim for STT refund? and It is necessary to file income tax return? If he claim for refund then what the process??

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031