Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sunita Shreegopal Barasia Vs Asstt. CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sunita Shreegopal Barasia Vs Asstt. CIT (ITAT Mumbai) Conclusion: Penalty under section 271(1)(c) could not be levied for bonafide explanation furnished by assessee as assessee had not offered interest income for tax due to wrong interpretations of the provisions of the Act, not on account of deliberate concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of such income. Held: Assessee had claimed exemption under section 10(4)(ii) for receiving interest on NRE deposit under the bona fide impression that she was a non-resident under the provisions of Foreign Exchange Management Act, 19...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930