Case Law Details
Case Name : Sunita Shreegopal Barasia Vs Asstt. CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sunita Shreegopal Barasia Vs Asstt. CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Conclusion: Penalty under section 271(1)(c) could not be levied for bonafide explanation furnished by assessee as assessee had not offered interest income for tax due to wrong interpretations of the provisions of the Act, not on account of deliberate concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of such income.
Held: Assessee had claimed exemption under section 10(4)(ii) for receiving interest on NRE deposit under the bona fide impression that she was a non-resident under the provisions of Foreign Exchange Management Act, 19...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

