This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Penalty U/s. 271(1)(c) cannot be imposed for mere non-application of Rule 8D by assessee
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ACIT Vs Ms Shyam Basic Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2009-10
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Brief of the case:
ITAT held in ACIT Vs Ms Shyam Basic that if the assessee had made a wrong claim in the return of income but had furnished full particulars in its return of income then it would not amount to concealment if income and penalty u/s 271(1)(c) could not be levied.
Moreover for levying of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) particulars had to be inaccurate and inaccurate particulars means the details filed in the return of income were not accurate or exact or correct according to truth or erroneous.
Facts of the case:
Assessee had received dividend of Rs 1,83,157/- which was an...
