Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : JCIT Vs Cybertech Systems & Software P. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. Nos. 3655, 3656 & 3657/Mum/2006
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/08/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Brief of the case

Assesse’s claim for exemption u/s 10B was denied. A.O. also passed a penalty order u/s 271(1)(c) for raising a false claim for exemption. Tribunal found that assesse had not even challenged rejection of claim in appeal. Moreover, judgments relied upon by assesse for raising such a claim were found distinguished on facts. Tribunal, thus concluded that assesse deliberately furnished false particulars of income. Accordingly, impugned penalty order was confirmed.

Facts of the case

  • The assessee claimed benefit u/s.10B on the interest income earned on deposits placed with the bank/s for fixed term/s (FDRs) and inter-corporate deposits (ICDs).
  • Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031